In the New Testament, there are two accounts of the genealogy of Jesus Christ; both are impossible from a physical, as well as a spiritual perspective. If David calls his Messiah Yahweh, how then is the Messiah the son of David (Matt 22:41-45)?
John 10:30 I <G1473> and <G2532>my Father <G3962> are <G2070> one <G1520>
- And is a divisive word, and that is not the meaning of G 2532. We must use also, even, indeed, or likewise instead. These words are connectors, in that they join together rather than divide.
- Remove the word my, as this word is a possessive pronoun meaning belonging to. Think of this word my, as an added trinitarian insertion.
- The word are (G2070), is said to be derived from I AM, or I Exist (G1510), which obviously is the first person singular.
- I AM (which is singular), can not be derived from the word are (which is plural).
- Replace the word are (G2070) which is plural, and means we are. Use “I AM” instead.
- I, and my Father (or we), cannot be one.
A better translation of John 10:30 is I (am) indeed the Father, I AM One (Emphasis added for readability)
John 1:12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the children of Yahweh, even to them that believe on his name
This monotheistic affirmation destroys the credibility of the doctrine of trinitarianism.
Jude 1:25 To the only wise God our Savior, be glory and majesty, dominion and power, both now and ever, Amen
Act 4:12 Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved
The appearance of the Messiah brought forth from the Father, cannot be presented as a part of any lineage of mankind. There is no genealogy of Jesus Christ (in part) because there was never anyone with this name or title.
Isa 42:8 I AM Yahweh that is my name, and my glory shall you not give to another, neither give praise to graven images
Yahweh is the one who anoints or blesses His children. And Messiah is the very image of Yahweh.
Listen therefore Israel to Yahweh; thy God Yahweh is One (Deut 6:4).
Yahweh is the God and Father, of those who are Baptized through His Spirit, into a united and faithful body (Eph 4:2-7, 1 Peter 4:10).
If Yahweh Alone is Savior, our Messiah’s claim of being Savior is only valid if He is Yahweh manifest in the flesh.
Mat 1:1 The book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham
Our Messiah (who is falsely referred to as Christ) has no actual physical lineage, and we must not ignore His virgin birth. He also is called the Son of Yahweh. Moreover Messiah our Savior existed before Abraham was born. Also, the word begat (G1080) when used within the context of genealogies in Mat 1:2, means to procreate as the father.
John 3:18 He that believeth <G4100> on <G1519> him <G846> is <G2919> <G0> not <G3756> condemned <G2919>: but <G1161> he that believeth <G4100> not <G3361> is condemned <G2919> already <G2235>, because <G3754> he hath <G4100> <G0> not <G3361> believed <G4100> in <G1519> the name <G3686> of the only begotten <G3439> Son <G5207> of God <G2316>.
John 3:18 He that believeth in him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of Yahweh
The phrases, only begotten of the Father, and, only begotten Son, occur six times in the (KJV of the) New Testament.
Strong’s G3439, can be translated as only, or only child. The word begotten is added without warrant.
The translations of begat, and begotten are from two entirely different Greek words (G1080 and G4416).
Heb 11:17 By faith Abraham, when he was tried, offered up Isaac: and he that had received the promises offered up his only begotten son
When the word begotten, is added to Heb 11:17, few would think to question this translation. It makes perfect sense, right? Abraham did indeed begat a son called Isaac.
But then the false scribes added the word begotten an additional five times without warrant, in John 1:14, 1:18, 3:16, 3:18, and 1 John 4:9. The pretense is made by means of a trinitarian dialect, that the Son is a separate person from that of the Father. This is all part of creating, and then selling, the trinity doctrine of deception, that unfortunately occupies the minds of many.
A vain attempt is made, to create an illusion that there is a clear distinction between the Father and the Son, even though there is not one. Indeed, the
There are many problems with this divisive rhetoric. The Son is the actual image of the Father, and yet some teach that our Messiah reflects the “character” of God, but not the actual appearance of God. I refer to this as (distorted non-logic or) vain jangling (1 Tim 1:6-7). Once again, let me state the obvious, in order for our Messiah to be the only true Savior, He must be Yahweh.
A Savior Named Jesus – Not So Says Yahweh
Utilizing Psalms 110:1, to uncover the deceitful use of the word Lord in Luke 20:41-44, will invalidate the trinitarian theory forever and for always. Our Messiah’s affirmation that He is Yahweh negates the teachings of a trinity, and a Savior named Jesus. See the section below entitled, a conversation amongst the Gods.
Our Messiah came forth as the visible manifestation of Yahweh in the flesh (2 Cor 4:4, Col 1:15, Rev 1:8, 4:8, John 10:30, 14:7). This means that to look upon the one called Messiah, is to look upon Yahweh Himself.
Heb 1:3 Who being the brightness, glory, likewise the character (G 5481) himself in person, and upholding all things by the word of his power…
The Greek word Charaktēr (G 5481), is translated as an express image, and a definition of the exact copy is given. But the fact is that the word character (used in Heb 1:3) is associated with the sum of the essential qualities that explain or identify the nature of Yahweh.
Yahweh, who many times and in different ways spoke in times past unto the fathers through His prophets, has in these last days spoken unto us through the Son, who was the preordained heir of all things, by whom also the worlds were made. Who is the brightness of the glory of Yahweh, and the exact image (or character) of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, He himself who purged (or cleansed us from) our sins dwells as the right hand of majesty on high (Heb 1:1-3).
For your reading pleasure, Heb 1:1-3 has been detrinitized.
My God is Yahweh, He did not require the assistance of another God when He raised Himself from the dead.
As well, the God I serve, does not sit at the right hand of another God (See also: Jude 1:25, Mat 1:23, 13:41, 14:33, 16:16, 18:11, 21:9, 24:30, 25:31, 26:64).
Yahweh the Father did not beget, or bring into existence the Son (using the traditional human reproduction process). And, begotten from a Spiritual perspective, means to bring forth.
And that is what took place in Bethlehem. The Holy Child came forth from the Father. He was not sent by the Father, nor was He a literal child of the Father in the carnal sense. The lying pen of the scribes have conspired to conceal the fact, that Yahweh manifest Himself in the flesh as the Messiah.
The translation of gennaō, from Strong’s G1080, is the word begat. It can also be translated as bear, bring forth, conceive, or be born.
Luke 1:35 And the angel answered and said unto her, the Holy Spirit shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy one which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of Yahweh
The Son is the Glory of the Father, because He is Yahweh, our Savior (2 Cor 5:10, Psa 62:12, Jude 1:25, 1 John 2:23, Mat 1:23, John 14:7-9, Isaiah 9:6, John 10:30). The Genealogy of Jesus Christ is a ridiculous assertion.
Mat 16:27 For the Son of man shall come in the glory of the Father Himself, with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works
The false teachers declare that the deity of Jesus includes a human genealogy, combined with him being part of a triune Godhead, that includes the person of the Holy Spirit.
It is Yahweh’s spirit that is poured out upon the elect (Pro 1:23, Isa 44:3, Eze 36:27, 37:14, 39:29, Joel 2:28-29, Acts 2:17).
Strangely enough, the Miracle of a virgin giving birth to the promised Messiah (who is the actual image of Yahweh, revealed in the flesh), is all but ignored. The parables contained within Holy Scriptures need not be a mystery. And yet, the spiritually discerned truth escapes those with a carnal mindset.
Yahweh in the flesh
Mat 23:34 Wherefore, behold, I sent unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye killed and crucified; and some of them ye scourged in your synagogues, and persecuted them from city to city
The fact that our Messiah is Yahweh is evident in Mat 23:34, which is properly translated above in the past tense according to Mat 23:35-39. (See also Luke 6:22-23, 11:50-51, Mat 5:17, 23:30-31, Luke 16:16, 24:19). Also compare Luke 13:34 with Psa 17:8, 36:7, 63:7, 91:4.
Yahweh sent the prophets (2 Ch 24:20-21, 36:16). The name of Yahweh is claimed by Messiah who said, “I sent unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes.”
Luk 11:20 But if I with the finger of Yahweh cast out devils, no doubt the kingdom of God is come upon you.
Our Messiah who did indeed speak in parables clearly identifies Himself as Yahweh again in Luke 11:20.
Luke 2:11 For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord.
To say that Christ is Lord is to completely avoid using His name, and Yahweh forbids His children from taking His name in vain.
For unto you is born this day in the city of David the Saviour who is Yahweh the Messiah (Luke 2:11). The true name of the Savior is Yahweh, therefore, the theory of the genealogy of Jesus Christ represents purposeful deceit.
According to Judeo-Christian teachings, the name Yahweh is too sacred to be spoken. But this is contrary to what Yahweh commanded (Gen 4:26, 1 Kings 18:24, Psa 99:6, 105:1, 145:3).
Many people claim that God has many names. This rhetoric is irreconcilable with what Yahweh declares (Eze 20:9, 22, 43:7, Isa 45:23).
Psa 86:9 All nations whom thou hast made shall come and worship before thee, O Yahweh; and shall glorify thy name
Consider what is deceitfully referred to as the Lord’s Prayer. This is a guide on how to pray to Yahweh (who is the Father), and what to ask of Him.
Far too many recite the words given in Mat 6:9-13 without first studying this important teaching. This is in spite of the warning not to pray using vain repetitions, that is given in Mat 6:7.
Mat 6:9 After this manner therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed (or Holy) is thy name Emphasis added
Our Father who art in Heaven has a name above all others; that name is Yahweh (Mat 6:5-15).
Psa 148:13 Let them praise the name of Yahweh, for his name alone is excellent; his glory is above the earth and heaven
We are commanded to glorify the name of Yahweh for He has created all things (Gen 1:1, Rev 4:11).
Phil 2:10 That at the name of Yahweh every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth
The genealogy of Jesus is an Impossibility
The name of Yahweh has been replaced with the fictitious name of Jesus in Phil 2:10, and the false title of Lord in Rom 14:11. Both of these passages are in reference to Isa 45:23. The Glorious name of Yahweh can not be translated as LORD (6,510x), GOD , or JEHOVAH (4x). The genealogy of Jesus Christ is an impossibility, and this false name and title were created in an attempt to keep mankind from seeking Yahweh.
Yahweh’s Word is Absolute, Authoritative and Unconditional! Yahweh alone is Savior, and all shall kneel before Him (Psa 95:6).
Isa 45:22 Look upon me your Savior all the ends of the earth: for IAM Yahweh and there is none else (besides me) Emphasis added
How is it that Yahweh can be replaced by another Savior whose name is not even mentioned in the Old Testament (Isa 43:3, 11, 45:15, 49:26, 63:8). What further proof is needed that the genealogy of Jesus Christ is a lie.
Rom 14:11 For it is written, As I live, saith Yahweh, every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall acknowledge Yahweh
Most Bible translators omit the words, of our Lord Jesus Christ, in Eph 3:14. However the phrase Father of our Lord Jesus Christ is found in six other verses.
- The word our, is a possessive determiner.
- However when the word of is added, the who with regards to the possession is changed.
- When Eph 3:14 is correctly interpreted, it is easy to determine who actually possesses the title of Messiah.
Eph 3:14 (KJV) For this cause I bow my knees unto the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ
In order for our Messiah to be both Savior and God (Isa 45:21), He must be Yahweh.
Eph 3:14 For this <G5127> cause <G5484> I bow <G2578> my <G3450> knees <G1119> unto <G4314> the Father <G3962> of our <G2257> Lord <G2962> Jesus <G2424> Christ <G5547>
Eph 3:15 Of <G1537> whom <G3739> the whole <G3956> family <G3965> in <G1722> heaven <G3772> and <G2532> earth <G1909> <G1093> is named <G3687>
It shall come to pass, at the end of this age, that those who call upon the name of Yahweh shall be (saved or) delivered (Joel 2:32, Rom 10:13).
Exo 3:15 And Yahweh said moreover unto Moses, thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, Yahweh the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, He hath sent me unto you: that is His name for ever, and that is His memorial unto all generations
Yahweh is the name of our Savior, who is called the Messiah. More evidence for this Scriptural Truth is revealed in the following verses. See the bullet points below.
But these scriptures must first be properly transliterated. To transliterate is to change the characters (of a name) from one alphabet or language, into the corresponding characters of another language. The sound of the original name is to be preserved, but usually not the meaning.
The Glorious title of Messiah (Falsely called Christ) would not be translated. Christ is not derived from any Hebrew word. Furthermore Messiah can not be translated as anointed. This means the One who anoints us with His Spirit and is God, can not be the anointed one by another God.
It is imperative to change the words “the Lord” to Yahweh.
We must always insert the proper title of Messiah, where the word Christ is used.
The only possible way that Messiah’s claim of being Savior can be true, is if He is Yahweh!!!
- Yahweh the Father alone is Savior (Isa 45:21).
- Our Messiah is the very image of the Father (2 Cor 4:4, Col 1:15, Rev 1:8, 4:8, John 10:30. 14:7).
- Those who called the Son of God Messiah were keenly aware that He was the Savior (Luke 2:11, John 4:42).
- The genealogy of Jesus Christ is discussed and written about by the deceivers and the students of the deceived.
A Conversation Amongst The Gods?
Scriptural integrity can only be maintained if the word of Yahweh is presented as it was given.
Psalms 110:1 The LORD <H3068> said <H5002> unto my Lord <H113>, Sit <H3427> thou at my right hand <H3225>…
How is it even possible to falsely preach that Psalms 110:1 describes a conversation between God the Father and God the Son, when the true interpretation of this verse is so clearly presented by our Messiah?
The translation of the LORD said unto my Lord, that is presented represents slander, libel, defamation of character and it is a malicious falsehood. But why is this the case, and what spiritual forces are behind this deception? Could it be that the wickedness that was in the hearts of the betrayers and murderers of the Messiah, was also very much alive in the hearts and minds of the Bible translators (Mat 23:13-38, Luke 24:20, Acts 7:52)?
A comma tells readers that one phrase has been completed, and that another part of the sentence is about to begin.
By placing the comma after the word Lord, in Psa 110:1, instead of after the word me (mistranslated as my), the object of who was spoken to is changed.
For David said in the Spirit; Yahweh said unto me, sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool (the second, and smaller lord refers to King David).
If David called his Messiah Yahweh, how can Messiah be the Son of David? This proves that the Genealogy of Jesus the Messiah, as recorded in Mat 1:1-17, is a fraudulent insertion (Luke 20:41-44).
Yahweh is the name of our Messiah. That is what our Savior declared, and the religious leaders did not attempt to deny it.
After revealing this truth through the interpretation of Psalms 110:1, no man (including the Scribes and Pharisees) was able to answer his words. Neither did anyone from that day forth, ask him any more questions (Mat 22:42-46).
The Essential Revelation that is discovered in Psalms 110:1 when properly interpreted changes everything. The fact that David calls his Messiah Yahweh, is a truth that can not be ignored.
Because Mark 12:36 has been trinitized, the second insertion of the word Lord has been replaced with the name of David, for ease of understanding.
Mark 12:35 And He answered and said, while he taught in the temple, How say the scribes that Messiah is the Son of David?
For David himself said by the Holy Spirit; Yahweh said to me, David remain thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool (Mark 12:36).
Mark 12:37 David therefore himself called him Yahweh; and whence is he then his son? And the common people heard him gladly
Mark 12:36 For <G1063> David <G1138> himself <G846> said <G2036> by <G1722> the Holy <G40> Spirit <G4151>, The LORD <G2962> said <G2036> to my <G3450> Lord <G2962>, Sit thou <G2521> on <G1537> my <G3450> right hand <G1188>, till <G2193> <G302> I make <G5087> thine <G4675> enemies <G2190> thy <G4675> footstool <G5286> <G4228>
- The word Lord is the translation of kyrios (Strong’s G 2962), meaning lord, sir, or master. It is stated that kyrios comes from kuros, which has a meaning of supremacy. Why is it that a Strong’s number for kuros is not provided?
- A more notable fact is that neither one of these Greek words have an origin from the Hebrew name of Yahweh.
- Furthermore, the title of Lord is used to address both God and men, and that is an impossibility.
A grievous crime is, to remove the name of Yahweh from the Holy Scriptures, and replace His name with a title that is shared with common men. The etymology of the word Lord is not taken from YHWH (H3068), and as such, it is not a transliteration. Also, the name of Yahweh could never be translated as Lord.
In Psa 110:1 the two words, LORD and Lord, do not have the same meaning, as they are derived from two completely different Hebrew words. One is a deceitful transliteration of the name of God, the other a reference to the status of a man. But at least these two words are easily distinguishable from one another when using a Strong’s Concordance.
However, in Mark 12:36, all of a sudden the two Lords are presented as being from the same mysterious root source, which Strong’s has not provided for us.
So right now you’re probably asking yourself, how then do we distinguish between these (G 2962) Lords in the New Testament? The more appropriate question must be, why is the false suggestion of a plurality of Gods introduced at all (Mat 23:13-15, Rom 16:17)?
The mental association disorder that is presented by religious for profit organizations, does not dismiss the fact that three distinct persons all being God, can’t be one God. Yahweh revealed Himself in the person of our Messiah; obviously a plurality of persons that make up a Godhead is an impossibility.
The transliteration of YHWH (H3068), must always be Yahweh. We are not permitted to change the Creator’s name into a title of our choosing.
Taking Yahweh’s Name in Vein
Gen 24:27 And he said, Blessed be Yahweh, God of my master (H113) Abraham
The word adon (H113), can never be used to address Yahweh. The Hebrew word adon can be translated as sir, lord, or master; it is used in reference to men (see Genesis 24:27, Jer 37:20).
Psa 114:7 Tremble, thou earth, at the presence of the Lord, (H113) at the presence of the God of Jacob
The earth and the inhabitants thereof shall more than tremble when Yahweh returns to judge the world, even those wicked ones that took His name in vain. (Isa 42:14-15, 64:1-7, Eze 38:19-23, 39:7-17, Mic 1:1-5, Zec 14:1-9, Nah 1:1-6, Rev 16:17-21).
Exo 20:7 Thou shalt not take the name of Yahweh thy God in vain; for Yahweh will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain
Vain, in Exodus 20:7, means emptiness of speech. Examples of this premeditated and spiritually wicked act would include omitting the name of Yahweh or replacing His name with Lord. What about those who discuss a fictitious Genealogy of Jesus Christ? That should be the textbook definition of a useless group of words.
The Aramaic translation of Psa 114:7, is more accurate than most other translations, once the word LORD is removed, and Jehovah is changed to Yahweh. At least the recognition of God is given using a name and not a title. Also, the word and which is divisive should be changed to even.
Aramaic Bible in Plain English
The Earth shook from before LORD JEHOVAH and from before the God of Jacob.
Cross references to Psa 114:7, are found in Psa 29:2, 33:8, & 96:9-13.
Psa 96:9 O worship Yahweh in the beauty of holiness: fear before him, all the earth
The insertion of adon (H113), translated as Lord in Psa 114:7, and Psa 136:3, is further evidence of the lying pen of the scribes at work. We are to give thanks to Yahweh, for His mercy (upon us) endures forever.
Psa 136:3 O give thanks to the Lord (H113) of lords (H113), for his mercy endureth for ever
- The distorted mental gymnastics necessary to teach that Yahweh can be addressed as Lord is frightening. The title of lord can only be used to address men (Psa 8:9, 97:5, 136:3, Zec 4:14, 6:4-5, Mal 3:1).
- What is the textbook definition of spiritual cognitive dissonance? It is when one’s deeply held beliefs are contradicted by Scriptural truths, and the preexisting faulty or impaired reasoning is maintained in spite of factual evidence that is presented.
- This can transpire when a person’s cognition (or ability to understand or think) is compromised through mind control techniques. The article entitled the identification of a Christian cult, exposes some of these indoctrination tactics.
- Those who display cognitive dissonance can not justify or rationalize their beliefs. Forced compliance using peer pressure, is all too often a contributing factor to this unfortunate coping mechanism.
- Quite often, the perceived value with regards to a particular doctrine, trumps reality.
- The pretribulation rapture is a good example of this.
- Those who can’t accept living through the Great Tribulation, simply choose a fictional escape from it.
- Mistranslated Scriptures that support their beliefs are embraced, as are the false preachers that present these teachings.
In the Old Testament, the word “LORD” in all caps, is widely used as an incorrect transliteration of Yahweh. Interestingly enough, there are no capital letters in the Hebrew language.
In the New Testament “LORD” is used only five times in the KJV (Mat 22:44, Mar 12:36, Luke 20:42, Act 2:34, Rev 19:16). Four of those verses are in reference to Psa 110:1, where apparently the Big LORD speaks to the little Lord.
The false scribes forgot the “all caps” in Psa 114:7, and in Heb 10:30 which is a direct reference to Deuteronomy 32:35-36.
Jude 1:4 For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ
In Jude 1:4, lasciviousness has a meaning of filthiness, shamelessness, or offensive behavior with no respect towards Yahweh. The conundrum is that the very warning that there would be damnable deniers that Yahweh is Messiah, is witnessed by the false interpretation of this verse.
Apparently one of these Lords is God, and the other Lord is the Christ; how can this be? Let’s fix this verse, and determine the proper context.
Jude 1:4 For there are certain men who crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this damnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only God, even Yahweh our Messiah
In Dan 2:47, King Nebuchadnezzar said “your God is a God of gods, and a King of kings.” Lord of Kings is a deceitful translation. See also Eze 26:7, and Dan 2:37, for references.
Dan 2:47 The king answered unto Daniel, and said, Of a truth it is, that your God is a God of gods, and a Lord of kings, and a revealer of secrets, seeing thou could reveal this secret
Revelation 19:16 represents yet another impossible verse wherein this title of LORD is presented in all caps. But it is still a mistransliteration of the name of Yahweh (See also Psa 136:3).
Rev 19:16 And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS
According to the deceitful works of the false translators, the title of LORD is always inserted in reference to Yahweh. What pray tell, does Yahweh of Yahweh’s mean?
Isa 51:22 Thus saith thy Lord (H113) the LORD (H3068), and thy God that pleadeth the cause of his people
Thy Lord, the LORD, and thy God is a very confusing group of titles.
Adonai or Adonay (H136), is another fabricated alternative name to replace Yahweh. Adonai is an apparent emphatic form of adon (H113), used as a proper name of God. However, a word for God, can’t have its origin from a word that refers to men.
Psa 16:2 O my soul, thou hast said unto the LORD (H3068), Thou art my Lord (H136), my goodness extendeth not to thee
Mat 13:13 Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand
Our Messiah said, in them (the spiritually blind and deaf), it is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah.
Isa 6:9 And he said, Go, and tell this people, Hear ye indeed, but understand not; and see ye indeed, but perceive not
Mat 1:2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat…
This lineage of the physical seed of Abraham starts with Isaac and continues with Jacob, who is referred to as Israel, the father of twelve sons, or the 12 tribes of Israel.
And Jacob begat Joseph (Mat 1:16). After Joseph is mentioned, this is the point wherein the carnal or earthly lineage ends. Joseph was not the father of the Messiah.
Mat 1:16 And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ
A more likely translation of Mat 1:16; Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born the one spoken of, the Messiah.
There never was anyone named Jesus who was called Christ. Furthermore, the lineage (of men) that started with Abraham, ended with Joseph.
Messiah said, before Abraham was I AM. Yahweh our Messiah created Abraham, and could not be a part of the lineage, of the one He created.
The Word of God Has Been Trinitized
Rev 4:8 And the four beasts had each of them six wings about him; and they were full of eyes within: and they rest not day and night, saying, Holy, holy, holy, Yahweh God Almighty, which was, and is, and is to come
Mary was not impregnated with the seed of man, she gave birth to the Son of Yahweh, a sinless child, whose Spirit preceded that of Abraham.
Rev 1:8 I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith Yahweh, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty
Rom 11:26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Zion (or Jerusalem) the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob – Emphasis added
To understand better the meaning of “all of Israel shall be saved” refer to the study guide entitled, the identity of the true Israel of Yahweh. This means the second gathering of Yahweh’s Israel is a future occurrence at the end of this age.
Mat 2:6 And thou Bethlehem, in the land of Judea, art not the least among the princes of Judah: for out of thee shall come a Governor, that shall rule my people Israel
Keep yourselves in the love of God, looking for the mercy of Yahweh our Messiah unto eternal life (Jude 1:21).
Isa 45:21 …who hath told it from that time? have not I Yahweh? and there is no other God beside me, a just God and a Savior; there is none beside me
One can not reconcile Isa 45:21, with Jude 1:25 and Acts 4:12, unless Messiah our Savior is Yahweh.
John 14:7 If ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also: and from henceforth ye know him, and have seen him
Our Messiah not only claimed to be equal with the Father, but He also declared that He is the Father.
Messiah can’t be called Christ
To refer to the Messiah simply as the anointed one is very misleading. To the faithful believers of Yahweh, Messiah was the one who would deliver them from their sins. All the fulness of Yahweh resides (or dwells) in the body of our Messiah (Col 2:9).
One of the most important events ever recorded in Holy Scripture was the arrival of the Messiah who would take away the sins of the world (Heb 8:12-13, Rom 11:27).
- The title of Messiah (Māšîaḥ or Messias) is used twice in the KJV of the New Testament (John 1:41, John 4:25), and twice in the Old Testament (Dan 9:25, 26).
- Messiah (falsely transliterated as Christ) is inserted over five hundred times in the New Testament, whereas Messiah is only spoken of twice in the Old Testament.
- The transliteration of H4899 (from the Old Testament), is Māšîaḥ. It can be spelled Messiah in English, but it carries the same sound.
- In the New Testament the transliteration of G3323 is Messias (is only used twice), it is of Hebrew origin from Māšîaḥ (H4899).
- Christos (G5547), is translated into English as Christ, but it is not derived from the Hebrew title of Māšîaḥ, and is therefore another fraudulent insertion. Consider the deceitful words (which is called Christ), in John 4:25, and in John 1:41, (where it is falsely declared that Messias is to be interpreted as the Christ).
- Why is it, that there is a separate word for anointed, and Messiah, in the New Testament, but not in the Old Testament? This represents a wicked conspiracy against our Messiah.
Messiah does not mean Christ, nor can this Glorious title be interpreted as the anointed one. Messiah is the one who anoints those deemed worthy.
John 6:69 Also we believe and are sure that thou art the Messiah, the Son of the living God
For unto them that day in the city of David was born the Savior, who is Yahweh the Messiah (Luke 2:11).
John 1:41 ESV He first found his own brother Simon and said to him, “We have found the Messiah” (which means Christ).
John 1:41 KJV He first found his own brother Simon, and saith unto him, we have found the Messias (which is, being interpreted, the Christ)
John 4:25 The woman saith unto him, I know that Messias cometh, (which is called Christ) when he is come, he will tell us all things.
The (words in parentheses) in John 1:41, and John 4:25, are added without warrant. One day, the false translators just decided (just like that) Messiah would be interpreted as Christ in all other New Testament passages.
John 1:45 Philip findeth Nathanael, and saith unto him, We have found him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph
The lying pen of the false scribes is again evident in John 1:45, as none of the prophets spoke of a Nazarene named Jesus.
John 1:49 Nathanael answered and saith unto him, Master, thou art the Son of God; thou art the King of Israel
1 John 3:5 And ye know that he was manifested to take away our sins; and in him is no sin
John the Baptist said, “I am the voice of one crying in the wilderness, make straight the way of the Yahweh, as said the prophet Isaiah” (John 1:23).
John 1:29 The next day John seeth (Yahweh) coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world
How can we reconcile 1 John 3:5, and John 1:29, with Isa 43:25, unless Messiah our Savior is Yahweh?
John (who was filled with the Holy Spirit) knew that his Savior was Yahweh. He declares this in John 1:23, quoting Isaiah 40:3-5.
Isa 43:25 I, even I, am he that blotteth out thy transgressions for mine own sake, and will not remember thy sins
Messiah is not the anointed one separate from Yahweh, for He is Yahweh manifest in the flesh.
The new living translation prefaces Matthew 1:1, with the statement, the Ancestors of Jesus the Messiah. This is the same as saying the Genealogy of Jesus Christ.
A descendant is a person that is descended from a particular ancestor. Messiah did indeed descend from the Heavens (a higher place) to the earth below. But, He is not the descendant of any man; nor is he a descendant of an earthly Father.
Consider Melchisedec, King of Salem, the priest of the most high God. He was without father, without mother, and without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life. And he was made like unto the Son of God, continuing as a priest forever (Heb 7:1-3).
John the Baptist testified of his Messiah. He cried out loud, saying, this was He of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me; for He was before me (John 1:15).
John 3:13 And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven
Who is this Son of man? Consider these verses (Mat 13:41, 18:11, 19:28, 20:18, 20:28, 24:7, 24:30, 24:37-44, 25:31, John 3:28-31).
The anti-trinitarian teachings of our Messiah are prevalent throughout the Gospels. I came not of myself, is a profound statement that is passed by as if it is meaningless. He also said to Philip, “He that sees me has also seen the Father” (John 14:9). And yet the tin hat trinitarians want to talk about the Genealogy of Jesus Christ.
He said unto them if God were your Father you would love me, for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but of the same, I am sent forth (John 8:42).
The Samaritans Knew Messiah as Savior
One of the most incredible individual conversations that our Messiah had, was with a woman from Samaria. It was also one of the longest.
These particular scriptures might have upset the scribes that disliked the Samaritans. Perhaps this is why they inserted this nonsensical verses such as the one listed below. I know who I worship for my Salvation will come from Yahweh.
John 4:22 Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews
Jerusalem and Samaria both had the same mother, Samaria was Jerusalem’s older sister, and Sodom was the younger sister. Sodom was destroyed by fire. According to Yahweh this fate was also in Jerusalem’s destiny, as she was more corrupt in her whoredoms than Samaria (Ezek 23:1-49).
During the final 3 1/2 years of Jerusalem’s existence, before Messiah returns, this city is spiritually compared to Sodom and Egypt (Rev 11:8).
Isaiah 1:21-22 How is the faithful city become an harlot! it was full of judgment; righteousness lodged in it; but now murderers. Thy silver is become dross, thy wine mixed with water
The Samaritan woman was the first person that the Messiah revealed Himself to as Yahweh in the Gospel of John. He said unto her,” I AM the One that speaketh unto thee” (John 4:26). She also became the first female New Covenant evangelist (John 4:28-29).
Unlike the scribes and Pharisees, the Samaritans who claimed to be the children of Jacob were the ones that recognized the Messiah as their Savior (John 4:12).
John 4:42 And said unto the woman, now we believe, not because of thy saying: for we have heard him ourselves, and know that this is indeed the Messiah, the Savior of the world
The parents of the blind man, who was given sight by the Messiah, feared the Judeans. The religious leaders (of the false tribe of Judah) had already conspired to put out of the synagogue, any man that did openly declare that Messiah healed the one who was born blind (John 9:1-34).
God has no Genealogy
When He (the Messiah) asked His disciples who say ye that I am? One of them, named Simon Peter answered, Thou art the Messiah, the Son of the living God (Mat 16:16).
To be the son of God (whose name is Yahweh) is to be Yahweh revealed in the flesh.
Mat 16:20 Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was Jesus the Christ
There is only one option for Mat 16:20; our Savior instructed His disciples to tell no man that he was Yahweh the Messiah.
Luke 9:20 He said unto them, But whom say ye that I am? Peter answering said, The Christ of God
The words Jesus, and Christ, represent a false name and a mistranslated title. God is an appropriate title, but it is not a name. The disciples knew very well that their Savior was the Messiah (John 1:41). Would they not also know the name of their Messiah?
John 1:45 Philip findeth Nathanael, and saith unto him, We have found him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph
Compare John 1:45 with Isaiah 7:14. Immanuel means God with us (Mat 1:23). Jesus was not the name of the Messiah, who also was not the son of Joseph. Furthermore none of the prophets wrote of anyone called Jesus.
Isa 7:14 Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel
With the proper transliteration, and translation of John 20:31, the truth becomes rather apparent. Jesus, Christ, and God are not names.
When reading John chapter 21, replace the name Jesus with He or Him. In John 21:1, & 4, replace Jesus with Yahweh. Also, replace the word Lord with Yahweh. Then, the Gospel truth emerges.
But these are written, that ye might believe that the Messiah, the Son of God is Yahweh; and that believing ye might have life through his name (John 20:31).
The Spirit of Yahweh (the Messiah) that dwells within a “Born Again Believer” is proof that a down payment towards an inheritance has been received. It also is a pledge to complete the purchase at a later date, when the Heir receives the entirety of their inheritance.
We can have the assurance of Salvation. To become Saved is to be redeemed from our sinful flesh; this is when we are risen and clothed with immortality and incorruption (Eph 1:13-14, Luke 21:25-28, 1 Cor 15:51-54).
The shed blood of the Lamb was the price paid, and redemption is the reward at the end of this age.
Yahweh did indeed manifest Himself in the flesh, and He alone is Savior. Our Messiah is Savior only if He is Yahweh.
Luke 2:26 And it was revealed unto him by the Holy Ghost, that he should not see death before he had seen the Lord’s Christ
And it was revealed unto Simeon by the Holy Spirit, that he should not see death before he had seen Yahweh as Messiah.
Simeon declared that he had looked upon the One who would provide for his Salvation (Luke 2:30).
Zec 12:10 And I will pour upon the house of David, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and of supplications: and they shall look upon me whom they have pierced, and they shall mourn for him, as one mourneth for his only son, and shall be in bitterness for him, as one that is in bitterness for his firstborn
It is quite impossible to reconcile Zec 12:10, with Rev 1:7, unless Yahweh is Messiah.
Rev 1:7 Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so, Amen
According to Strong’s the Hebrew word that is spelled Mashiach (H4899), is transliterated as Masiah and then translated into English as Messiah. Christ does not represent an actual transliteration or translation. A Hebrew word that refers to Yahweh would not be translated into a Greek word. Christ and Lord are meaningless titles brought forth by the lying pen of the scribes.
Words are usually only translated. However, the title of Messiah is not any ordinary word, and so this transliteration is correct. Also, the meaning of Messiah couldn’t be captured in a single word, so a translation would be impossible. Messiah is the master, the Son of God, the Savior, the Redeemer, and the Nazarene that abides forever.
Luke 3:15 And as the people were in expectation, and all men mused in their hearts regarding John, whether he was the Messiah, or not
Luke 3:16 John answered, saying unto them all, I indeed baptize you with water; but one mightier than I cometh, the latchet of whose shoes I am not worthy to unloose: he shall baptize you with the Holy Spirit and with fire
The title of Messiah is presented in Dan 9:25 and 9:26.
Dan 9:25 Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times
How is it possible that Messiah is mentioned over five hundred times in the New Testament, but only twice in the Old Testament? The answer is, the lying pen of the scribes.
Dan 9:26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the ruler that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined
Messiah did indeed confirm (or establish) the covenant during His 3-1/2 year ministry. Refer to the study guide, confirm the covenant with many.
Dan 9:27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate
The Lamb of Yahweh was manifest in the flesh to take away the sins of the world. He indeed caused the sacrifice or sin offerings to cease.